Archive

Posts Tagged ‘c’

Review of Phonak, Rexton and Starkey Hearing Aids

August 2nd, 2009 No comments
by Barb Hicks

# Phonak Review:

A Swiss manufacturer, this company produces small, powerful and lightweight hearing aids available in most skin and hair colors. Its unique design allows the device to automatically adjust to sound changes in the environment.

Although most Phonak customers report satisfaction with their purchase, some did complain that background noise was filtered along with voice sounds.

Phonak has 8 hearing aids to choose from: Exelia, Naida, Andeo, Savea Art, Eleva, micro Eleva, Extra Unio and Micropower.

This company has received the Medical Design Excellence Award and specializes in assisting hearing impaired children. A customer review posted on Amazin.com states that he is experiencing problems having the device adjusted properly. Whether this is an audiologist error or a device malfunction is not known. Phonak offers its customers a warranty of one to two years. In addition, this customer reports that you should find someone familiar with the device or expect to pay numerous fees for several adjustment visits.

At a price of $2,295.00 on Amazon, with the regular retail being #3,999.00, customers can purchase the Phonak Micro Savia Art CRT Hearing Aid by Phonak AG Hearing Instruments.

#Rexton Hearing Aids:

Rexton has been in business for over 50 years making affordable hearing aids for the hearing impaired. They have a range of audio friendly hearing aids including BTE (behind-the-ear), CIC (completely in the canal) to Full Shell models. Their catalog currently includes the Revera, the Calibra, and the Targa. They come in half shell, ITE, mini canal and completely in the canal shells.

Located in Minneapolis, Rexton supplies hearing aids to the needy as well as offering programmable analog hearing aids. This company offers a one to two year product warranty depending on the device purchased as well as a 2 Year LOSS POLICY!

Silkfair.com offers Rexton's most affordable hearing aid, the Rexton Arena 1P Digital BTE for the small amount of $319.00.

For $1989.00, customers can purchase a set of two Rexton HearClearly hearing aids with a remote control.

# Starkey:

Starkey has been in business since 1973 and operates over thirty-five facilities in twenty-four countries.

Their Destiny hearing aid is mid-level, and the ELI is a high end hearing aid that is bluetooth compatible. The Destiny 1600 is new and comes with a self help diagnostic tool which informs the wearer of the instruments performance.

For the Destiny 1600, Starkey was awarded the Brand of the Month in June 2008. This model comes in BTE, ITE, ITC and CIC types and has the ability to automatically adjust to changes in the environment.

Starkey offers its customers a free trial and one year warranty. All of Starkey's hearing aids are programmed to eliminate whistling. They also feature low battery warning, autophone, memory and adaptability and logging.

Starkey products can be found and purchased at Precisehearing.com. However, the site boasts of low prices, so there is no price listing. Customers interested in purchasing a Starkey product must call for a current price listing.

About the Author:

Personal Injury Medical Malpractice Cases

July 30th, 2009 No comments
by Amy Nutt

The term Personal Injury refers to harm that is caused to a person including bodily damage or slander. Injury that is incurred by accident, negligence or inflicted with intent all classify as Personal Injury.

Medical Malpractice falls under the Personal Injury umbrella and is a relatively common occurrence. This is action or failure to act in accordance with the accepted standards of the medical community. When a health medical facility or professional provides a standard of care that is negligent and results in injury to the patient, it is considered malpractice or wrongful death claims. The following are typical issues:

- Lack of or mis-diagnosis. This can result in worsening of symptoms or illness or create a new illness in the patient. In this event, the patient may not have given all pertinent information for the doctor to make an appropriate diagnosis. The individual is responsible to answer all questions truthfully to assist the doctors work. Especially important is disclosure of all medications being taken, as they dramatically alter the picture of a patients health. It is also sometimes the case that all information was given but not taken down or was mis-read. It may also have seemed irrelevant in the scenario.

- Surgical errors. The result of this is physical damage to the body whether internal or external. It may result in meaning, causing emotional damage to the patient and requiring additional expense for correction. It may also cause an organ to require repair or replacement.

- Prescription or medication errors. This is an adverse affect when the wrong medication or wrong dosage of the right medication is recommended. There have been recalls by the FDA on weight loss and other products that were found to cause organ damage. Individuals who have suffered these damaged are eligible to file a lawsuit against the maker of the product. Other suits may stem from cases in which a patient did not disclose other medications being taken and suffered side-effects of the interaction.

- Accidental or wrongful death. This is the worst-case scenario and may be caused by any or all of the above events and warrant a lawsuit by the remaining of the victims family.

A suit should be filed whenever it can be proven that the professional was responsible to provide a standard level of care and failed to meet the standard, resulting in injury to the victim. Since statute of limitations vary from state to state and will then become statute barred' and not succeed, the suit should be filed immediately after the occurrence. Professional legal assistance is required, since only 38% of plaintiffs are compensated when representing themselves. Victims or their families should seek a board certified attorney. Board certification indicates that an attorney is respected within the field and has substantial experience, having tried at least ten cases in civil court.

In the event that a victim questions whether their situation classifies as medical malpractice, they should err on the side of caution. A reputable attorney will provide good advice and many offer a free consultation. From there, a course of action can be decided and there are agencies available to help with the costs incurred to pursue the case in court.

About the Author: